-
Carlo Ginzburg
In the verbal register that produces for us this map these () interviewed () speak of as they had been creating conditions of survival in this place. D. Maria says in them of what it considers as bigger difficulty in the period of the occupation: the hunger; for cozia sacia it dend or green banana. They had been planting other foods, but the hunger does not wait. In the memory of this people-memory we could perceive many common points, many signals disclosed for the souvenirs that went if revealing in our colloquies. Strong souvenirs in relation to the participation of on people to the Church Catholic, the example of priests of a nun; expressive souvenirs in relation to the material conquests, the example of the chafariz, the flour house, the school.
It was by means of our colloquies that we were identifying what Franois Dosse calls of memorial signals. For Ricoeur (apud DOSSE, 2204, P. 151) the memorial signals are classified in cortical, psychic and material. It fits to stand out that this third dimension of the memory places in them, according to Dosse, in the field of the historical inquiry. These dimensions, ' ' they constitute, therefore, alone, the inevitable imbricao of history and the memory, disclosed for signal in the expression of Carlo Ginzburg of a paradigm ' ' indicirio' ' on which history would depend, the opposite to the paradigm ' ' galileano' ' ' '.
Amongst the found memorial signals in the passage of this research, the materials that call in them the attention are: The flour chafariz, house, the school. These ruins are symbols livings creature of a history; each one of them counts a little of this fight based on hope in the courage. Hope and courage of a people who taking conscience of its to be in the world, goes to search what he can be its for right.