• Charles Taylor

    Date: 2013.12.31 | Category: General | Tags:

    What keeps this multiplicity of themselves in a certain relationship of mutual belonging is the common project that keeps them together, but once that project is gone no one can speak of a self that is identified with the person as a whole. The project of a person’s life is, then, what allows us to speak of the person as a whole. It is recalling to Charles Taylor, the orientation of the person, their values as principles the action guide which gives coherence to the life story of that person and unit to the multiplicity of roles which is involved its self. And this, we must not forget, has to have a further function as It is the permit the individual to deal effectively with its surroundings, in the words of the evolutionary psychologist I could no doubt be made of many sub-themselves separate, but these if themselves have come to belong to the same if I am because they are involved in one and the same company: the company of guide me – body and soul–through the physical and social world. (Humphrey, 2009, 101). From the point of view of the development of the individual, the self is not innate in person because it is not, for example, that a baby is a life project.

    Even if that baby is able to differentiate themselves from others and assume a variety of roles with others who reported some use in particular situations, the truth is that until a life project to build not consciously, this multiplicity of themselves that is do not constitute an auto-constituido human being. (Cf. Humphrey, 2009, 103) In other words, he has not reached yet be the conductor of the Orchestra that is his life. Returning to the question of whether there is someone moving the threads of the story that apparently we are, Kessel et to the.